Explore the forces between atoms at the molecular scale
The Lennard-Jones potential models the interaction between a pair of neutral atoms. The r⁻¹² term represents Pauli repulsion at short range, while the r⁻⁶ term represents van der Waals attraction at longer range. The equilibrium distance is where the force is zero, corresponding to the minimum potential energy. This model explains bonding, phase transitions, and molecular structure.
Plus 148+ other Pro labs covering AP Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science, and Math — with unlimited simulation time, advanced parameters, and detailed analytics.
Already have an account?
Sign in →Pour a glass of water and you're staring at trillions of molecules pulled together just hard enough to stick but pushed apart hard enough not to collapse. Those competing forces between neutral atoms give matter its solid, liquid, and gas phases — and they're well captured by an equation Lennard-Jones wrote down in 1924. Two atoms attract weakly when far apart (van der Waals forces), cross zero potential at separation σ, reach equilibrium at r = 2^(1/6)σ, and repel violently if pushed closer (Pauli exclusion). Plot potential energy versus distance and you get a characteristic well: shallow attraction reaching down to a minimum at the bond length, then a near-vertical wall on the short side. This simulation drops atoms onto a canvas with that potential active, lets you set temperature, and shows molecules forming, vibrating, and breaking apart depending on whether their kinetic energy can climb out of the well.
MisconceptionThe Lennard-Jones potential is just a force; the curve shape doesn't matter much.
CorrectThe shape is everything. The curve has two distinct regions with completely different physics: a steep r⁻¹² repulsion wall on the left (Pauli exclusion preventing electron-cloud overlap) and a gentle r⁻⁶ attraction tail on the right (van der Waals dipole–dipole interaction). The minimum of the potential sits at r = σ × 2^(1/6), which is the equilibrium bond length. Force is zero at the minimum, attractive to the right of it, and ferociously repulsive to the left. Treating it as 'just a force' misses why atoms have a definite size.
MisconceptionEquilibrium distance means the atoms aren't moving.
CorrectEquilibrium distance is just where the *net force* on each atom is zero. At any nonzero temperature the atoms still vibrate around that distance with thermal kinetic energy. The colder you go, the smaller the vibration. Even at absolute zero quantum mechanics gives a residual zero-point motion. So 'equilibrium' here means 'average position' or 'energy minimum' — never 'frozen in place.'
MisconceptionAtoms repel when squeezed together because their nuclei push on each other.
CorrectThe repulsion is overwhelmingly between the *electron clouds*, not the nuclei. Two neutral atoms have no net charge and their nuclei are buried deep inside electron shells. When the clouds start to overlap, Pauli exclusion forces electrons into higher-energy states, and that's what costs energy and pushes the atoms apart. Nuclear-nuclear electrostatic repulsion only becomes the dominant effect at extreme energies (think nuclear fusion temperatures), not at room-temperature interatomic distances.
MisconceptionLennard-Jones describes chemical bonds like the ones in water or salt.
CorrectIt describes weak, non-bonding interactions — van der Waals forces between neutral atoms or molecules. Real chemical bonds (covalent, ionic, metallic) involve actual electron sharing or transfer and are far stronger and more directional than what Lennard-Jones models. The depth of a typical Lennard-Jones well is around 0.01 eV; a covalent bond is more like 4 eV. Lennard-Jones is the right tool for noble gases, surface adhesion, and intermolecular forces between separate molecules — not for bonds inside one molecule.
The r⁻⁶ term comes from theory: it's the leading-order van der Waals attraction between two neutral particles whose induced dipoles correlate, which can be derived rigorously from quantum mechanics. The r⁻¹² term is empirical convenience — it's repulsive, very steep, and equal to (r⁻⁶)² so the math is fast on a computer. A more accurate repulsion is exponential (Pauli exclusion gives ~e^(−r)), but r⁻¹² is close enough and much easier to evaluate inside molecular dynamics simulations.
Both ε (well depth, in energy units) and σ (the distance where U=0) are properties of the specific atom pair. Bigger atoms have larger σ; more polarizable atoms have larger ε. Argon has σ≈3.4 Å and ε/k_B ≈ 120 K — that's why argon liquefies at 87 K (k_B T ≈ ε is the rule of thumb). These constants come from experiment or from full quantum calculations and are tabulated for almost every atom pair.
The size comes from the steep repulsive part of the Lennard-Jones potential. Atoms can be treated as soft spheres with radius near σ because at distances shorter than that the repulsion is so steep it might as well be a wall. So when chemists draw atoms with definite radii (van der Waals radii), they're really drawing the distance at which the repulsive part of this potential turns on. The 'mostly empty space' statement is about the nucleus inside; the *interaction radius* is set by where the electron clouds start to overlap.
Forming a bond means dropping into the potential well, which releases ε of energy as kinetic energy. If the surrounding kinetic energy is much less than ε, the atoms get trapped. If kinetic energy is comparable to or larger than ε, atoms can hop out of the well and bonds break statistically. That competition is why phases exist: solid (KE ≪ ε), liquid (KE ~ ε), gas (KE ≫ ε). Cooling lets you build bonds; heating breaks them.
SAP-1.A covers the model of matter as particles whose interactions create observable bulk properties — the Lennard-Jones potential is the textbook example of such an interaction. SAP-1.B addresses how forces between particles shape phase behavior, fluid pressure, and elasticity. Watching atoms form clusters at low T and disperse at high T is a direct visualization of that connection between microscopic forces and macroscopic phases.