Assemble protons and neutrons to explore nuclear stability
Atomic nuclei are held together by the strong nuclear force, which overcomes electromagnetic repulsion between protons. Stability depends on the neutron-to-proton ratio. Too many or too few neutrons lead to radioactive decay. Binding energy per nucleon peaks in the iron-nickel region (with Ni-62 slightly highest), explaining why fusion releases energy for light elements and fission releases energy for heavy elements.
Plus 148+ other Pro labs covering AP Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science, and Math — with unlimited simulation time, advanced parameters, and detailed analytics.
Already have an account?
Sign in →Pick up a proton, drop it into the nucleus. Add another, then a third. Now start adding neutrons. Watch the stability indicator: too few neutrons and the protons repel each other apart, too many and the imbalance triggers beta decay. Hit the sweet spot and you've assembled a stable isotope. This is the geography of nuclear matter — every dot on a chart of nuclides is a different combination of protons (Z) and neutrons (N), and only a thin band through the middle is actually stable. Light nuclei prefer roughly equal numbers, but as Z climbs above 20 the neutron count has to outpace the proton count to dilute proton-proton repulsion. Past lead nothing is truly stable. The simulation lets you walk that landscape, build any isotope from hydrogen-1 to oganesson, and predict whether you've made something that lives forever or something that will spit out a particle within seconds.
MisconceptionAtoms are mostly empty space because the nucleus is hollow.
CorrectThe nucleus itself is incredibly dense — packed solid with nucleons that nearly touch. The 'mostly empty space' phrase refers to the whole atom: the nucleus is roughly 1/100,000 the diameter of the atom, with the electron cloud filling the rest. If you scaled an atom to the size of a sports stadium, the nucleus would be a marble at the center. Inside that marble there's no empty space at all.
MisconceptionAdding more protons always makes the nucleus more stable because more particles means more strong-force binding.
CorrectStrong-force binding is short-range — each nucleon only interacts with its neighbors. Coulomb repulsion is long-range — every proton pushes on every other proton through the entire nucleus. So as Z grows, repulsion grows faster than binding. That's why binding energy per nucleon peaks in the iron-nickel region and falls off afterward, and why every element heavier than lead is unstable.
MisconceptionIsotopes of the same element are identical because they're the same element.
CorrectChemically nearly identical, nuclearly very different. Carbon-12 is stable forever, carbon-14 is radioactive with a 5,730-year half-life. Uranium-235 fissions readily and powers reactors; uranium-238 is far less fissile. Same proton count means same chemistry, but neutron count drives nuclear stability, mass, and decay properties. That's why isotopes are central to dating, medicine, and nuclear power.
MisconceptionThe neutron-to-proton ratio for stable nuclei is always 1:1.
CorrectOnly true for the lightest elements. Helium-4, carbon-12, oxygen-16 have N=Z. By calcium (Z=20) you start needing more neutrons than protons. Gold-197 is Z=79, N=118 — about 1.49 neutrons per proton. Uranium-238 sits at 1.59. The ratio creeps up to dilute Coulomb repulsion. Plot Z vs. N for stable isotopes and you get the famous curving 'valley of stability' rather than a straight line.
It's the optimum balance region. Below the iron-nickel peak, nuclei gain binding faster than Coulomb repulsion grows; above it, repulsion among many protons starts to dominate, so adding more nucleons costs binding. Ni-62 has the slightly highest binding energy per nucleon, while Fe-56 is a common stellar endpoint shorthand. That peak explains why fusion releases energy below the region and fission releases energy above it.
Atomic number Z is just the proton count, and it defines the element — Z=6 is always carbon. Mass number A is the total number of nucleons, A = Z + N. Two different isotopes have the same Z but different A. The notation ⁱᴬZ X (like ¹⁴₆C for carbon-14) packs both numbers in. In nuclear reactions both A and Z are conserved across the equation, which is the rule that lets you balance every decay.
Because emitting an alpha particle (a tightly bound He-4 nucleus) is the most energetically favorable way for a heavy nucleus to shed mass. The alpha is so well bound that ejecting one releases a lot of energy, which the daughter nucleus and the alpha share as kinetic energy. Lighter unstable nuclei usually can't afford to emit a whole alpha, so they prefer beta decay or other channels.
No. Bismuth-209 was thought to be stable for decades, but in 2003 it was shown to alpha decay with a half-life of about 10¹⁹ years — longer than the age of the universe, but technically not forever. Past Z=82 every nucleus eventually decays. Heavy-element synthesis in stars and supernovae produces them, but on Earth they only stick around if their half-life is at least comparable to the age of the solar system.
MOD-3.A covers nuclear structure — protons, neutrons, isotope notation, and the strong force overcoming Coulomb repulsion, which is exactly what students manipulate in the simulation. MOD-3.B covers binding energy and mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²) — building a stable nucleus from free nucleons releases energy equal to the binding energy, and the simulation shows this directly via the binding-energy chart.