Explore how slit width and wavelength shape the diffraction intensity pattern
Single-slit diffraction arises from Huygens' principle: every point within the slit acts as a secondary wavelet source. At the central maximum (θ = 0) all wavelets arrive in phase, producing maximum intensity. At the first minimum, the slit can be divided into two halves whose wavelets cancel pairwise. The condition a·sinθ = mλ locates all minima (m ≠ 0). The central bright fringe is twice as wide as the side maxima and carries most of the light energy. Narrowing the slit increases diffraction (wider central maximum) — a direct consequence of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle at the quantum level. When two slits are present, the single-slit envelope modulates the double-slit interference fringes, producing missing orders wherever a diffraction minimum coincides with an interference maximum.
Plus 148+ other Pro labs covering AP Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science, and Math — with unlimited simulation time, advanced parameters, and detailed analytics.
Already have an account?
Sign in →Shine a laser pointer through a narrow slit at a wall and you don't get a single bright line — you get a wide central bright band with a parade of dimmer bands fading away on either side. That pattern is single-slit diffraction, and it is one of the cleanest pieces of evidence that light is a wave. Every point inside the slit re-radiates the incoming wave (Huygens' principle), and on the screen those secondary wavelets either reinforce each other or cancel pairwise depending on path length differences. The minima sit exactly where a·sinθ = mλ, and the full intensity profile is a sinc² envelope with most energy in the central maximum, twice as wide as any side fringe. The simulation lets you change the slit width, sweep the wavelength, push the screen back, and overlay a double-slit pattern to see how the envelope modulates double-slit fringes.
MisconceptionDiffraction proves light is only a wave and has no particle behavior.
CorrectDiffraction is wave behavior, but it does not erase photon evidence. A beam of many photons builds the same diffraction pattern one detection at a time, while the photoelectric effect shows that light energy arrives in quanta. The modern picture needs both: wave amplitudes set probabilities, and photons arrive as discrete events.
MisconceptionA wider slit gives a wider diffraction pattern.
CorrectBackwards. A wider slit gives a narrower pattern; a narrower slit gives a wider pattern. Width on the screen scales as λL/a, with a in the denominator. Make the slit big enough and diffraction effectively disappears — the light just goes straight through.
MisconceptionAll the bright fringes in a single-slit pattern are the same width.
CorrectThe central maximum is twice as wide as any of the secondary maxima. The minima sit at sinθ = mλ/a for m = ±1, ±2, ±3..., so the central peak runs from m = −1 to m = +1 (width 2λ/a), while every secondary peak only spans one m-step (width λ/a).
MisconceptionIf I cover half the slit, the pattern just gets dimmer by half.
CorrectReducing the slit width a doesn't merely dim the same image — it changes the geometry. The central maximum gets wider, the angles of the minima shift, and for uniform illumination through a fixed-height slit the transmitted power drops roughly in proportion to the slit width. You don't get half a pattern; you get a different pattern.
MisconceptionIn a double-slit experiment, the slit width doesn't matter — only the spacing does.
CorrectSlit spacing sets the fast interference fringe spacing, but slit width sets the diffraction envelope that modulates them. If a/d is just right, entire interference orders disappear because the diffraction zero lands on top of an interference maximum. AP Physics 2 questions love this combination.
It looks counterintuitive but it's exactly what wave physics predicts. The central fringe half-angle is sinθ ≈ λ/a. Smaller a means bigger sinθ, which means the light has to spread out over a wider angular range. Physically, confining the wave to a narrower slit forces it to have a broader range of transverse momentum components, which translates directly into a broader spread on the screen — a classroom-friendly preview of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
They're really the same physics — superposition of wavelets — applied in slightly different settings. Interference traditionally refers to a small number of discrete sources (like two slits), while diffraction refers to a continuous distribution of sources (every point inside one slit). In the double-slit experiment both happen at once: each slit individually diffracts (wide envelope) and the two slits' outputs interfere (fast fringes inside the envelope).
At θ = 0 every wavelet from across the slit arrives in phase, so the amplitudes all add. As you move off-axis the wavelets fan out of phase and their sum drops fast — the sinc² envelope falls to about 4.5% at the first secondary maximum. About 90% of the transmitted energy is in the central peak, and the rest leaks into the side fringes.
Roughly. A circular aperture of diameter D produces a similar central spot (the Airy disk) with first dark ring at sinθ ≈ 1.22 λ/D. The 1.22 factor comes from the Bessel-function geometry of a circle versus a slit. Same physics, slightly different math, and it's what sets the resolution limit of every telescope and camera.
WVS-1.D covers the conditions for constructive and destructive interference in wave systems, which is what locates the diffraction minima. WVS-1.E asks students to relate wavelength, slit width, and screen geometry to predict fringe positions and explain qualitatively how the pattern changes when each variable is altered. The simulation lets students do exactly that with controlled, reproducible inputs.