Preview
Gravitational Fields
Field strength, potential wells, and escape velocity
In 1666 Newton asked whether the pull that drops an apple could reach the Moon. The Moon sits 60 Earth-radii away, and its centripetal acceleration came out almost exactly 1/3600 of surface g — 60 squared. One law for falling apples and falling moons, and the inverse-square signature was born. This lab hands you that law as a landscape. A central mass prices every point of space around it: the field strength g = GM/r² tells you how hard space pulls at that address, and the potential V = −GM/r tells you how deep the well is there. Both are live on the panel, and they do not fade at the same rate — double your distance and the pull quarters while the depth only halves. That difference is the whole game. The well picture pays off at the escape threshold: climb out until your kinetic energy exactly cancels the negative potential, and your total energy is zero — that speed, √(2GM/r), is the escape velocity, and it does not care how massive your ship is. You will also meet two honest surprises. The preset named 'Earth Surface' parks you a full AU away, where g is about two billionths of 9.81 — names are not physics. And the 'black hole' preset, for all its purple glow, prices an escape speed of barely 1 km/s — a real black hole needs the escape speed to reach light itself. The field never switches off, the well never bottoms out at zero, and every number on the panel is yours to predict before you touch a slider.
What you'll be able to do
- Price the inverse-square field on the panel's own numbers: at the default state (10 M_E, 3 AU) g = GM/r² = 1.978793e-8 → row '1.979e-8 m/s²'; doubling the distance (3 → 6 AU) QUARTERS it to 4.946982e-9 ('4.947e-9'), and the full-domain sweep collapses g by exactly 400× (7.123654e-7 at 0.5 AU → 1.780913e-9 at 10 AU, (10/0.5)²) — Newton's Moon test as a slider: 'the Moon, at a distance of about 60R_E, has a centripetal acceleration about (60)² times smaller than g' (OpenStax UP1 §13.1, verified), because 'the surface area of that sphere is proportional to r²'
- Read the potential well as a signed depth, not a strength: V = −GM/r is always negative and climbs TOWARD zero as r grows ('U→0 as r→∞', 'U becomes increasingly more negative as the masses get closer' — OpenStax UP1 §13.3, verified) — at defaults −8880.8217 J/kg ('−8.881e-3 MJ/kg'), doubling r HALVES the depth to −4440.4109 ('−4.440e-3') while g quarters: same slider, two exponents. The Binding E row is the same book per kilogram (mTest = 1 kg hardcoded: −8.881e3 J ≡ −8.881e-3 MJ/kg, registered redundancy), and 'deeper in the well = more tightly bound' is the panel's own arithmetic
- Own the escape threshold as an energy statement, not a distance: v_esc = √(2GM/r) is 'the speed at any position such that the total energy is zero' (OpenStax UP1 §13.3, verified), with 'm canceled out… the same for all objects, regardless of mass' (verbatim — misconception 1's counter); on the panel the √M and 1/√r scalings are live (Central Mass 1 → 100 at 3 AU: v_esc 42.144565 → 421.44565 m/s, ×10 for ×100; distance ×4 → v_esc ÷2, the HTML quiz Q3's law). The 'Near Black Hole' preset prices v_esc = 1.03 km/s at (100 M_E, 0.5 AU) — 0.0003% of c, since 100 Earth masses would be a black hole only if squeezed inside its 0.886 m Schwarzschild radius (node-verified): the purple glow is a costume, the field law underneath is still Newton's
Formulas
Make a prediction
Default state: Central Mass 10 M_E, Test Distance 3 AU — the panel reads g = 1.979e-8 m/s² and V = −8.881e-3 MJ/kg. You drag Test Distance out to 6 AU, exactly twice as far from the central mass. What do the g and V rows read now?
No grading here — commit to a guess, then scroll down and test it yourself.
This is a Pro experiment
Upgrade to Pro to access this experiment — or keep learning with one of our free labs.
Check
Did the lab agree with you?
Your prediction
You skipped the prediction — jump back to the preview and commit to a guess first; the comparison is the whole point.
Answer: g = 4.947e-9 m/s² and V = −4.440e-3 MJ/kg — g pays the distance SQUARED (÷4), the potential pays it only once (÷2, climbing toward zero from below)
The two rows obey two different laws, and one drag exposes both. The field strength is g = GM/r²: doubling r from 3 to 6 AU divides g by 4, from 1.978793e-8 to 4.946982e-9 — the panel shows '4.947e-9 m/s²'. The square is geometry, not a fudge: 'The strength of any source at a distance r is spread over the surface of a sphere centered about the mass. The surface area of that sphere is proportional to r²' (OpenStax UP1 §13.1). The potential is V = −GM/r: doubling r divides only once, from −8880.8217 to −4440.4109 J/kg — the panel shows '−4.440e-3 MJ/kg', less negative, climbing toward the zero it reaches only at infinity ('U→0 as r→∞', §13.3). Option B is the linear instinct — it prices V correctly by accident and g wrongly, halving what should quarter; it is the exact trap the sim's own quiz Q1 sets with its '1/2 as strong' distractor, and Newton's Moon test is the historical refutation (gravity at 60 Earth-radii is 1/3600 of surface g, not 1/60). Option C is the zero-gravity-in-space misconception outright — and the field itself disagrees: gravity reaches the Moon and still steers it (§13.1), g at 400 km altitude is 8.67 m/s², 88% of surface (§13.3), and in this sim the g row never reads zero anywhere in the domain — even 1 M_E at 10 AU reads 1.781e-10 m/s². Astronauts float because they fall, not because gravity is gone. Watch the two rows as you drag: they move at different rates, and neither ever switches off.
Quiz (0/4)
At 3 AU from a 10 M⊕ body the panel reads g = 1.979×10⁻⁸ m/s². What will it read at 1.5 AU — and why is it not simply doubled?
The panel shows V = −8.881×10⁻³ MJ/kg and Binding E = −8.881×10³ J at the default state. Why are the two numbers the same?
Escape velocity from Earth is ~11.2 km/s. What is the ratio v_esc / v_circ?
The Near Black Hole preset reads an escape speed of just 1.03 km/s. How small would 100 M⊕ have to be packed for its escape speed to actually reach c?
You can now
- Price the inverse-square field on the panel's own numbers: at the default state (10 M_E, 3 AU) g = GM/r² = 1.978793e-8 → row '1.979e-8 m/s²'; doubling the distance (3 → 6 AU) QUARTERS it to 4.946982e-9 ('4.947e-9'), and the full-domain sweep collapses g by exactly 400× (7.123654e-7 at 0.5 AU → 1.780913e-9 at 10 AU, (10/0.5)²) — Newton's Moon test as a slider: 'the Moon, at a distance of about 60R_E, has a centripetal acceleration about (60)² times smaller than g' (OpenStax UP1 §13.1, verified), because 'the surface area of that sphere is proportional to r²'
- Read the potential well as a signed depth, not a strength: V = −GM/r is always negative and climbs TOWARD zero as r grows ('U→0 as r→∞', 'U becomes increasingly more negative as the masses get closer' — OpenStax UP1 §13.3, verified) — at defaults −8880.8217 J/kg ('−8.881e-3 MJ/kg'), doubling r HALVES the depth to −4440.4109 ('−4.440e-3') while g quarters: same slider, two exponents. The Binding E row is the same book per kilogram (mTest = 1 kg hardcoded: −8.881e3 J ≡ −8.881e-3 MJ/kg, registered redundancy), and 'deeper in the well = more tightly bound' is the panel's own arithmetic
- Own the escape threshold as an energy statement, not a distance: v_esc = √(2GM/r) is 'the speed at any position such that the total energy is zero' (OpenStax UP1 §13.3, verified), with 'm canceled out… the same for all objects, regardless of mass' (verbatim — misconception 1's counter); on the panel the √M and 1/√r scalings are live (Central Mass 1 → 100 at 3 AU: v_esc 42.144565 → 421.44565 m/s, ×10 for ×100; distance ×4 → v_esc ÷2, the HTML quiz Q3's law). The 'Near Black Hole' preset prices v_esc = 1.03 km/s at (100 M_E, 0.5 AU) — 0.0003% of c, since 100 Earth masses would be a black hole only if squeezed inside its 0.886 m Schwarzschild radius (node-verified): the purple glow is a costume, the field law underneath is still Newton's