Physics · PHY-019
Electric Fields & Equipotentials
Probe the voltage between two electrodes and map the invisible field.
- NGSS HS-PS3-5
- AP Physics 2 Unit 10
Included with a subscription. Create a free account to get started.

About this lab
Map potential on conducting paper and inspect fields around three-dimensional charge arrangements. High school students use the interactive 3D setup to switch the electrode pattern, move voltage probes, and choose spheres, plates, cylinders, or rings in the model-space station. The paper measurements build equal-potential contours and nearby-voltage comparisons. Model-space readings add vector fields, forces on a probe charge, and three-dimensional surfaces. A release experiment follows the changing energy of two spheres, linking the field and potential representations to measured motion in the same setup. These activities are aligned with NGSS HS-PS3-5 and AP Physics 2 Unit 10.
What this investigation asks
An electric field and an electric potential describe related but different properties of an electrical arrangement. This investigation compares force-direction representations with scalar potential measurements. Begin by stating the reference for zero potential and the sign of the test charge. A positive test charge follows the field direction, while a negative charge feels the opposite force. The potential at a point is energy per charge relative to a reference, so a large potential value alone does not determine the local field strength without information about how potential changes across neighboring positions.
Design and measure the comparison
Map potential on the conducting-paper arrangement by measuring several points under the same electrode voltage. Connect points sharing a reading to form equipotential contours, then compare their spacing. Retain the electrode shape and the zero reference in the record. A straight-electrode arrangement and a point-like-electrode arrangement produce different patterns. Use a consistently oriented pair of probes when estimating a potential gradient; changing probe direction changes which field component is being estimated, even when the midpoint is kept at the same location on the board.
Connect the record to the model
Construct field directions perpendicular to equipotential contours and toward decreasing potential. For a point-charge model, add field contributions as vectors and potential contributions as scalars. Two source charges can therefore cancel a field at a point while leaving a nonzero potential, or produce another combination depending on their signs and positions. Explain each sum separately. A dense collection of displayed arrows is a representation of the calculated field; the map measurements provide the local evidence used to connect that representation to a potential-gradient estimate.
Interpret the evidence and its limits
Distinguish a local gradient estimate from an exact value at every point of a nonuniform field. A finite probe separation averages across the nearby pattern, and electrode boundaries can make that estimate especially sensitive to location. Zero potential depends on the reference, whereas a potential difference between two points has physical meaning for the energy change of a specified charge. Report the measured difference, charge sign, and inferred energy change together. Do not describe a negative potential as automatically implying a field toward a particular axis without evaluating the spatial pattern.
Reference conditions and quantities
For the specified parallel-bar board at applied voltage 5.00 V, the reference field component is 50.00000 V/m across the listed interior measurement points. The value describes that board geometry and voltage. A different electrode pattern or a finite probe near a boundary needs its own gradient comparison; the voltage setting by itself does not guarantee a uniform field in every configuration.
Use the record to test your explanation
Write a prediction before collecting the comparison, naming the quantity that should change and the condition you will alter. Keep a reference run and vary one factor at a time when the question calls for a controlled test. Record the selected apparatus settings, units, and measurement interval. Where an activity supplies Ideal and Real modes or seeded variation, retain that identity with each record rather than mixing incompatible runs in one calculation.
Separate an instrument reading or counted observation from the model relationship used to explain it. Keep raw values alongside derived results so another student can reconstruct the argument. A graph needs labeled axes and a stated comparison range. If a result differs from a reference, inspect the conditions, rounding, and measurement procedure before changing the explanation.
For a classroom discussion, compare claims supported by the same evidence and identify an additional measurement that would distinguish competing accounts. Finish with a claim, the relevant observations, and reasoning tied to this course's model. State a specific limitation instead of assigning a general error label to every disagreement.
Related investigations
Compare charge interaction in Coulomb’s Law and stored field energy in Capacitors. Retain the reference potential, charge sign, and geometry when using a potential measurement to infer a force or energy change.
Common questions
Standards alignment
- NGSS HS-PS3-5
- AP Physics 2 Unit 10


