Physics · PHY-015
Fluid Flow
Punch holes in a tall bottle. Which jet shoots farthest, and why does it slow down?
- AP Physics 1 Unit 8
Included with a subscription. Create a free account to get started.

About this lab
Measure water jets from a draining bottle and investigate the pressure pattern in a Venturi tube. This interactive 3D experiment lets high school students open selected holes, maintain or release the water supply, and use the outlet control to change flow through the horizontal pipe. Landing marks and water-level records provide jet-speed and drainage comparisons. Dye pulses reveal relative motion through the wide and narrow pipe regions, where vertical tubes display pressure. Streamlines and energy-column views accompany the same run so the visible flow can be compared with its measurements. These activities are aligned with AP Physics 1 Unit 8.
What this investigation asks
A water jet's range depends on both its exit speed and the time available to fall. This investigation connects tank depth, hole position, and a horizontal landing measurement through a fluid-energy model. Define depth relative to the water surface and landing height relative to the opening before using a formula. A lower hole can produce a faster jet yet give less falling time to a fixed landing plane. The central question is how those effects combine, rather than which hole simply looks closest to the bottom.
Design and measure the comparison
Compare openings while retaining the water-surface height and landing level. Record the horizontal distance and fall height, then infer exit speed from the projectile travel time under the stated assumptions. As water drains, the surface moves and the opening's depth changes, so measurements at different times do not necessarily share the same pressure condition. Keep time and depth with the range. Predict the farthest-reaching opening for the selected geometry, then compare the full set rather than extrapolating from one pair of holes without a shared water level.
Connect the record to the model
Use energy conservation to relate the depth above the opening to the ideal exit speed. In a full pipe, continuity relates cross-sectional area and flow speed for incompressible flow. Distinguish that speed from the rate at which a much wider tank's surface descends. The flow rate combines speed and area, so a fast narrow jet can coexist with a slowly changing water level. In the horizontal-pipe comparison, relate pressure changes to speed changes using the course's Bernoulli account and explain how pressure differences accelerate the moving fluid.
Interpret the evidence and its limits
Retain the ideal-flow assumptions when comparing the calculations with modeled Real measurements. A nozzle's effective flow and losses can change the observed jet, while the range measurement also includes geometric and landing uncertainty. A pressure reading, volume flow rate, and exit speed are different quantities and cannot be directly substituted for one another. Report which measurement supports each inferred term. The apparatus is a teaching model for connected conservation relationships, not a complete description of turbulent flow, arbitrary pipe networks, or every changing free surface.
Reference conditions and quantities
The specified tank opening has area 1.256637061 × 10⁻⁵ m², while the tank cross-section is 0.006361725124 m². The reference area ratio is 0.001975308642. That ratio helps explain the difference between jet speed and surface descent rate; it is an apparatus quantity, not a measured speed or a pressure difference.
Use the record to test your explanation
Write a prediction before collecting the comparison, naming the quantity that should change and the condition you will alter. Keep a reference run and vary one factor at a time when the question calls for a controlled test. Record the selected apparatus settings, units, and measurement interval. Where an activity supplies Ideal and Real modes or seeded variation, retain that identity with each record rather than mixing incompatible runs in one calculation.
Separate an instrument reading or counted observation from the model relationship used to explain it. Keep raw values alongside derived results so another student can reconstruct the argument. A graph needs labeled axes and a stated comparison range. If a result differs from a reference, inspect the conditions, rounding, and measurement procedure before changing the explanation.
For a classroom discussion, compare claims supported by the same evidence and identify an additional measurement that would distinguish competing accounts. Finish with a claim, the relevant observations, and reasoning tied to this course's model. State a specific limitation instead of assigning a general error label to every disagreement.
Related investigations
Review the flight-time account in Projectile Motion, then compare pressure and force in Buoyancy & Pressure. Retain the relevant geometry and whether the fluid is stationary or flowing before choosing a relationship.
Common questions
Standards alignment
- AP Physics 1 Unit 8


