Physics · PHY-014
Buoyancy, Pressure & Drag
Lower a block into water and the scale drops. Drop a ball through syrup and it stops speeding up. Why?
- AP Physics 1 Unit 8
Included with a subscription. Create a free account to get started.

About this lab
Immerse a suspended block and time steel spheres falling through liquids to compare fluid forces. In this interactive 3D investigation for high school students, pick cylindrical samples and fluids, move the block vertically, and compare sphere diameters in the two falling-ball columns. Sensor and balance curves accompany the changing immersion volume. A pressure probe supplies readings at different depths, while slow-motion and velocity traces show the sphere's approach to a steady falling speed. The associated force diagrams combine weight, upward fluid force, and resistance throughout the observed motion. The investigation is aligned with AP Physics 1 Unit 8.
The question behind the experiment
An object can feel lighter while hanging in a liquid without losing mass. This investigation relates the reduced force-sensor reading to buoyancy, displaced liquid, and pressure differences. Compare the object's reading in air with its reading during immersion. Keep the object supported while making that comparison so you are not mixing an equilibrium reading with a freely accelerating object. The goal is to connect a measurable force change to the volume and density of the displaced liquid.
Plan a useful comparison
Lower the block gradually and distinguish partial immersion from full immersion. Record the liquid, block material, immersion position, and force reading. As more volume enters the liquid, the buoyant contribution changes; once the same block is fully submerged, moving it deeper does not continually increase buoyancy in the uniform-density model. Compare blocks of the same geometry but different materials. Their weights differ, while the displaced volume can remain the same at matched full immersion.
Connect the observation to the model
Read pressure on the upper and lower faces to explain the net upward force. Pressure increases with depth, so the lower face receives a larger upward contribution than the downward contribution on the upper face. Pressure itself is a scalar, while the force on each surface acts perpendicular to that surface. Keep gauge pressure distinct from absolute pressure. Adding the same atmospheric contribution to both faces does not change the difference used to explain the buoyant force.
Interpret the result carefully
The beaker's balance provides a second account of the interaction. The liquid pushes upward on the supported block, and the block pushes downward on the liquid. Compare the extra balance reading with the force-sensor reduction using compatible units. A balance displayed in mass units and a sensor displayed in force units cannot be subtracted directly. Use the relevant gravitational conversion, and explain which object or system each instrument is measuring before interpreting the agreement between the readings.
Build an explanation from your evidence
Density estimates follow from the same measurements, provided the submerged volume and liquid density are known. Check whether the block is fully submerged before using its full volume in the calculation. The release experiment asks a different question about subsequent motion and drag. An object that is stationary only because a support holds it is not necessarily neutrally buoyant. Separate initial acceleration, eventual motion, and the earlier suspended force balance when presenting your conclusion about whether an object rises or sinks.
A reference case from this course
For the specified fully immersed block geometry in water, the buoyant-force reference is 0.7389025921 N, independent of the selected block material. In the aluminum case, the sensor displays 1.26 N. Those values require the same immersed volume and liquid; a partial immersion or another fluid gives a different comparison.
Keep the investigation reproducible
Before changing the setup, write a prediction that names the measured quantity and the expected direction of change. Retain the original trial as a reference. Record the apparatus conditions, units, and whether you used Ideal or Real lab mode. If the selected activity includes seeded variation, keep the seed and run identity with the result so another comparison does not silently mix different conditions.
Separate the observation from its explanation. A reading or a counted object belongs in the evidence; the relationship you use to interpret it belongs in the reasoning. When a result differs from the reference case, check the settings and measurement procedure before deciding that the model relationship has failed. Describe a specific source of uncertainty and where it enters your calculation. Finish with a claim supported by the recorded comparison, and identify an additional trial that could distinguish your explanation from an alternative.
Continue the comparison
Revisit the interaction forces in Newton’s Second Law, or examine fluid energy relationships in Fluid Flow. State the system boundary and the meaning of each instrument reading before transferring a calculation between the experiments.
Common questions
Standards alignment
- AP Physics 1 Unit 8


